Fox & Watchdog
← Public evidence ledger
Washington Examiner
Article misinformation risk ★★☆☆☆ 1.9/5 Use caution · 3 checked claims
opinion

On This Day: Invasion, treason, and independence converge

Opinion recounting events of June 28, 1776: a large British fleet off Sandy Hook, discovery and punishment of a Loyalist conspiracy including the execution of Thomas Hickey from Washington's guard, a failed British bombardment of the palmetto-log fort on Sullivan's Island, and the Committee of Five presenting the draft Declaration of Independence to Congress.

Open the original Washington Examiner article ↗

Missing important context
Public importance 70/100

“Thomas Hickey, a member of George Washington's personal Commander-in-Chief's Guard, was convicted as the ringleader of a Loyalist plot and was hanged near Richmond Hill on June 28, 1776, before "upwards of 20,000" spectators.”

Attributed to Washington Examiner (opinion piece)

✓ Proof standard met 4 reachable references Independent-source requirement passed
Original context and attribution

Article recounts events in New York on June 28, 1776, saying a Loyalist conspiracy was uncovered that infiltrated Washington's guard and that Hickey was marched out and executed to send a message.

What the proof shows

Core facts are correct — Thomas Hickey (a member of Washington’s guard) was court-martialed and executed on June 28, 1776, and contemporary reports said the execution was viewed by a very large crowd. But the claim overstates the record in two ways: primary orders and contemporary accounts show he was convicted of mutiny, sedition, and ‘treacherous correspondence’ and hanged on army grounds, but court records and later scholarly work do not firmly establish him as the proven “ringleader” of a broad Loyalist assassination plot; and the execution site cited in many contemporary orders/newspapers is described as a field near the Bowery/encampments (Grand/Chrystie/Bowery Lane), not at Richmond Hill (Washington’s headquarters). The “upwards of 20,000” figure appears in a contemporary newspaper quoted in Washington’s General Orders (i.e., an on-site claim) but may be an overestimate.

Corrected version

Thomas Hickey, a member of General Washington’s Commander‑in‑Chief’s Guard, was court‑martialed, convicted of mutiny, sedition and treacherous correspondence, and was hanged on June 28, 1776 on ground between Continental encampments near the Bowery (contemporary reports place the execution near Grand and Chrystie Streets). Contemporary newspapers reported nearly 20,000 spectators. Primary records do not clearly show he was definitively the ringleader of a Loyalist assassination plot; he was the only person executed in the prosecutions that followed.

Automated evidence confidence: 0%

References and proof

Every link was reachable when published. Each proof point states how that source bears on the claim.

Official data Supports

Council of War, 27 June 1776 ↗

Founders Online / National Archives (George Washington Papers)
Proof point

The General communicated to the Council the Proceedings of the Court Martial on Thomas Hickey—when he was unanimously advised to confirm the Sentence & that it be put in Execution tomorrow at 11 oClock... GW’s warrant of 28 June ... authorizing Hickey’s execution ... These are therefore to will & require you to execute the sd Sentence upon the sd Thomas Hickey this Day at Eleven oClock in the Forenoon upon the Ground between the Encampments of the Brigades of Brigr Genl Spencer & Ld Stirling.

Official data Supports

General Orders, Head Quarters, New-York, June 28th 1776 ↗

Founders Online / National Archives (George Washington Papers)
Proof point

The unhappy Fate of Thomas Hickey, executed this day for Mutiny, Sedetion and Treachery... The Constitutional Gazette (New York) for 29 June reports: 'Yesterday forenoon was executed in a field between the Colonels McDougall and Huntington’s camp, near the Bowry-Lane, (in the presence of near 20,000 spectators) a soldier belonging to his Excellency General Washington’s guards,...'

Independent reporting Supports

Did George Washington’s Bodyguard Plot to Kill Him in 1776? (History.com) ↗

History
Proof point

On June 28, some 20,000 people gathered in a field just north of the city and watched a private in the Continental Army mount the gallows... Two days earlier Thomas Hickey ... was convicted ... and on the morning of June 28, 1776, was hanged for his crimes. ... The execution took place near the intersection of today’s Grand and Chrystie Streets, near the Bowery.

Independent reporting Contradicts

The Plot to Kill George Washington (Smithsonian Magazine) ↗

Smithsonian Magazine
Proof point

The doomed man was Thomas Hickey... Hickey was hanged for his crimes on June 28, 1776. The details of any larger assassination plot remain vague; many later embellishments (poisoning stories, named housekeeper testimony) are unsupported by the surviving court‑martial minutes and official examinations.

Mostly accurate
Public importance 70/100

“On June 28, 1776, a British naval squadron under Commodore Peter Parker bombarded the unfinished palmetto-log fort on Sullivan's Island, but the fort's palmetto-log construction caused British cannonballs to embed rather than shatter the walls, and the British fleet was badly damaged and forced to withdraw.”

Attributed to Washington Examiner (opinion piece)

✓ Proof standard met 5 reachable references Independent-source requirement passed
Original context and attribution

Article describes the Battle of Sullivan's Island, asserting the palmetto logs absorbed cannon fire and produced a Patriot victory that prevented Charleston's occupation.

What the proof shows

Contemporary and authoritative sources confirm the core facts: on June 28, 1776 a British squadron under Commodore Sir Peter Parker attacked the unfinished palmetto‑log fort on Sullivan's Island (Fort Sullivan, later Fort Moultrie). Multiple primary/official histories and Moultrie’s own account state the palmetto logs (backed with sand) absorbed much British shot — cannonballs often embedded in the soft wood and sand rather than shattering the parapet — and American gunners inflicted heavy damage on the British ships (notably Parker’s flagship Bristol). One British frigate (Actaeon) grounded and was burned, and Parker’s damaged squadron withdrew. Important context the Washington Examiner’s brief claim omits: the fort’s sand backing, unusually accurate American fire, navigational errors (groundings) and lack of sufficient boats/tide problems — and disagreements between Parker and Clinton about a landing — also contributed to the failure of the operation and the British withdrawal. Sources differ on exact casualty counts and on how much each factor (construction vs. gunnery vs. grounding/coordination) determined the outcome.

Corrected version

On June 28, 1776, a British squadron under Commodore Sir Peter Parker bombarded the unfinished palmetto‑log Fort Sullivan (later Fort Moultrie). The palmetto logs, backed with sand, absorbed much British shot (many balls embedded rather than shattering the walls); accurate American fire badly damaged British ships (notably HMS Bristol), one frigate ran aground and was burned, and with dwindling ammunition and an impracticable landing, the British squadron withdrew. The outcome reflected multiple factors — fort construction and sand backing, American marksmanship, navigational groundings, and lack of coordinated landing craft — not the palmetto logs alone.

Automated evidence confidence: 0%

References and proof

Every link was reachable when published. Each proof point states how that source bears on the claim.

Official data Supports

Battle of Sullivan's Island ↗

U.S. National Park Service (Fort Sumter & Fort Moultrie NHP)
Proof point

To defend against a British attack ... South Carolinians built a palmetto‑log fort ... the soft palmetto log revetments absorbed the damaging naval direct cannon fire ... Bristol, struck seventy times, suffered the most damage ... Parker signaled for the squadron to withdraw.

Independent reporting Supports

Battle of Sullivan's Island — Summary & Significance ↗

American Battlefield Trust
Proof point

Cannonballs buried themselves in the soft wood and sand rather than blasting apart the fortification; American gunners inflicted heavy damage on the attacking ships.

Other Supports

Battle of Sullivan’s Island ↗

George Washington's Mount Vernon (digital encyclopedia)
Proof point

The palmetto‑log fort ... six days before the Declaration of Independence ... the sandy and swampy terrain around Fort Sullivan also mitigated any serious damage by naval gunfire; Moultrie’s concentrated fire damaged the British flagship.

Other Supports

Charleston Expedition of Clinton in 1776 (article referencing naval documents) ↗

Encyclopedia.com (citing Naval Documents of the American Revolution)
Proof point

According to Parker's official report (Naval Documents, 5:997-1002), British casualties amounted to 64 killed and 141 wounded; Parker's flagship Bristol was heavily damaged and Parker blamed lack of army support in his dispatch.

Research Supports

Engineers of Independence: documentary history (quotes Moultrie’s memoirs) ↗

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (documentary history excerpting Moultrie)
Proof point

Moultrie's memoirs note a marshy 'morass' and sand inside the work that 'swallowed' incoming fire; 'shells that made it over the walls... were immediately buried, so that very few of them burst amongst us.'

Accurate
Public importance 70/100

“On June 28, 1776, the Committee of Five (Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston) presented their draft of the Declaration of Independence to the Continental Congress in the Pennsylvania State House.”

Attributed to Washington Examiner (opinion piece)

✓ Proof standard met 4 reachable references Independent-source requirement passed
Original context and attribution

Article states that while battles and treason unfolded elsewhere on June 28, these five men walked into the State House and presented Jefferson's draft to the delegates.

What the proof shows

Primary documentary evidence (Thomas Jefferson’s contemporaneous Notes of Proceedings) states the Committee’s draft was reported to the house “on Friday the 28th of June” and “read and ordered to lie on the table.” The Second Continental Congress was meeting in the Assembly Room of the Pennsylvania State House (now Independence Hall). Some official summaries (e.g., National Archives) emphasize that final Congressional action on independence came July 2–4 and describe the draft’s role in that later process; that wording can create the impression the draft was not reported earlier. The core claim — that the Committee of Five presented Jefferson’s draft to Congress at the Pennsylvania State House on June 28, 1776 — is supported by Jefferson’s notes and by multiple scholarly and institutional accounts, though Congress did not adopt the Declaration until early July.

Corrected version

On June 28, 1776, the Committee of Five reported (presented) Thomas Jefferson’s draft to the Second Continental Congress in the Assembly Room of the Pennsylvania State House (Independence Hall); Congress debated the measure July 1–4 and adopted the Declaration on July 4, 1776.

Automated evidence confidence: 0%

References and proof

Every link was reachable when published. Each proof point states how that source bears on the claim.

Primary source Supports

Notes of Proceedings in the Continental Congress, 7 June–1 Aug. 1776 ↗

Founders Online / National Archives
Proof point

the committee for drawing the declaration of Independance desired me to <prepare> do it. <I did so> it was accordingly done and being approved by them, I reported it to the house on Friday the 28th. of June when it was read and ordered to lie on the table.

Official data Contradicts

Declaration of Independence (1776) ↗

National Archives (Milestone Documents)
Proof point

Jefferson drafted the statement between June 11 and 28, submitted drafts to Adams and Franklin who made some changes, and then presented the draft to the Congress following the July 2nd adoption of the independence section of the Lee Resolution.

Official data Supports

Independence Hall: International Symbol of Freedom ↗

National Park Service (Independence National Historical Park)
Proof point

The Pennsylvania State House, the building we know today as Independence Hall, witnessed the creation of the United States of America. It was in the Assembly Room of this building that members of the Second Continental Congress debated and signed the Declaration of Independence.

Official data Supports

Appointment of Committee of Five to Draft Declaration of Independence (Rough Journal) ↗

DocsTeach / National Archives Foundation (Records of the Continental Congress)
Proof point

Appointment of Committee of Five to Draft Declaration of Independence; 6/11/1776 ... National Archives Identifier: 6171363 ... Papers of the Continental Congress, 1774–1789.

COMMUNITY EVIDENCE

Discussion

Disagreement is welcome. Spam and abuse are not.

No published comments yet. Add evidence or challenge the reasoning.

Members can comment for free

Create a free membership or sign in.