“The Supreme Court’s decision in Mullin v. Doe allows the Trump administration to send back hundreds of thousands of temporary refugees from Haiti and Syria.”
Attributed to Fox News opinion (David Marcus)
Article states Democrats are upset over the Mullin v. Doe ruling, which it says permits the Trump administration to follow through on plans to return hundreds of thousands of temporary protected-status refugees from Haiti and Syria.
What the proof shows
The Supreme Court’s Mullin v. Doe ruling removed lower-court stays and held that most non-constitutional challenges to TPS terminations are not judicially reviewable, allowing DHS to proceed with terminating TPS for Haiti and Syria. That decision does put hundreds of thousands of TPS beneficiaries (mostly Haitian TPS holders) at risk of losing status and work authorization and therefore at greater risk of removal. However, deportations are not automatic: termination of TPS removes the protection that prevented removal, but individual removal proceedings or other enforcement steps would still be required; some beneficiaries may have other lawful status or temporary court orders that delay implementation. The Fox News wording omits those important procedural and numeric details (the large majority of the “hundreds of thousands” are Haitian TPS holders; Syria’s TPS population is much smaller).
Corrected version
The Supreme Court’s decision in Mullin v. Doe allows the Department of Homeland Security to proceed with terminating TPS designations for Haiti and Syria, which would put roughly 330,700 Haitian TPS beneficiaries and several thousand Syrian TPS beneficiaries (as of March 31, 2025) at risk of losing legal status and work authorization — a step that could lead to deportation for many but would still require separate enforcement actions and is not an automatic mass expulsion.
Automated evidence confidence: 0%
References and proof
Every link was reachable when published. Each proof point states how that source bears on the claim.
MULLIN, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL. v. DOE ET AL. — Opinion of the Court (June 25, 2026) ↗
Supreme Court of the United StatesCourt held challengers are not entitled to orders postponing the TPS terminations; the terminations may proceed.
Temporary Protected Status and Deferred Enforced Departure (Congressional Research Service, table of TPS beneficiaries as of March 31, 2025) ↗
Congressional Research Service (CRS)CRS (USCIS data): As of March 31, 2025, 330,735 nationals of Haiti had TPS; 3,860 nationals of Syria had TPS.
The Latest: Supreme Court rules in favor of Trump administration on 2 immigration cases ↗
Associated PressAP: The Court voted 6-3 to allow the administration to end TPS for Haiti and Syria, "exposing hundreds of thousands more people to potential deportation."
Practice Alert: Supreme Court Rules Against Haitian and Syrian TPS Beneficiaries ↗
American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)AILA: The decision will allow TPS terminations to move forward; employers told TPS-based work authorization will end when terminations take effect.
Discussion
Disagreement is welcome. Spam and abuse are not.
No published comments yet. Add evidence or challenge the reasoning.
Members can comment for free
Create a free membership or sign in.