Breitbart
41.1% of evaluated claims had a documented problem.
112 claims across 55 stories · ranked See evidence →Fox & Watchdog monitors political and public-affairs claims across a growing network of conservative and right-wing media, traces repeated narratives, and publishes the proof behind every verdict.
We look for false statements, misleading framing, cherry-picked numbers, missing context, exaggerated headlines, altered quotations and claims repeated after correction.
Primary records determine the truth. Other news reports help locate evidence, but repetition does not turn a claim into proof.
A severity-adjusted error rate—not a count of articles. Publishing more stories cannot increase an outlet’s score by itself.
41.1% of evaluated claims had a documented problem.
112 claims across 55 stories · ranked See evidence →38.6% of evaluated claims had a documented problem.
70 claims across 44 stories · ranked See evidence →38.8% of evaluated claims had a documented problem.
98 claims across 63 stories · ranked See evidence →36.4% of evaluated claims had a documented problem.
88 claims across 50 stories · ranked See evidence →33.3% of evaluated claims had a documented problem.
75 claims across 43 stories · ranked See evidence →Investigations appear automatically as soon as the first material claim meets the proof standard.
Official feeds, alternate feeds, political sections and publisher sitemaps.
Only consequential, externally checkable factual claims.
Laws, courts, official data, transcripts and research first.
Verdict, correction, confidence, sources and related claims.